The reading this week is a spate of judgments where certain aspects of Regulation 1 have been considered. The first case (Walt Wilhelm) looks at the relationship between national and EU competition law; the ECJ returns to this in Toshiba, has anything changed, should it have? Then VEBIC, Tele 2 and Schenker all consider the design and operation of national laws. Consider how far these judgments might be perceived on the basis of the perspective considered the previous week.
Case 14/68 Walt Wlihelm v. Bundeskartellamt  ECR 1.
Case C-439/08 VEBIC  ECR I-12471
Case C-375/09 Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów v. Tele2 Polska sp. z o.o., devenue Netia SA  ECR I-3055
Case C-17/10 Toshiba, Judgment of 14 February 2012